home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #18 / NN_1992_18.iso / spool / comp / multimed / 2403 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-08-13  |  1.1 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!agate!garnet.berkeley.edu!jstern
  2. From: jstern@garnet.berkeley.edu ()
  3. Newsgroups: comp.multimedia
  4. Subject: Re: SuperMac's DigitalFilm
  5. Date: 13 Aug 1992 18:33:08 GMT
  6. Organization: University of California, Berkeley
  7. Lines: 17
  8. Message-ID: <16e9t4INN65k@agate.berkeley.edu>
  9. References: <1992Aug11.135536.10002@waikato.ac.nz>
  10. NNTP-Posting-Host: garnet.berkeley.edu
  11.  
  12. In article <1992Aug11.135536.10002@waikato.ac.nz> ldo@waikato.ac.nz (Lawrence D'Oliveiro, Waikato University) writes:
  13. >I picked up a press release for SuperMac's DigitalFilm product off AppleLink
  14. >a couple of weeks ago.
  15.  
  16. Anybody know what the advantages of DigitalFilm are over the New Video
  17. EyeQ DVI stuff? Why would I want to pay $6000 for DigitalFilm, when I
  18. can pay $4500 for the EyeQ authoring system? Also, right now there's not
  19. playback only board for DigitalFilm, whereas there's a $2500 playback 
  20. EyeQ board. I asked this of the folks who were showing DigitalFilm in
  21. Boston, but they played dumb about it...
  22.  
  23. Thanks,                
  24. Judy Stern
  25. Instructional Technology Program
  26. UC Berkeley
  27. jstern@garnet.berkeley.edu
  28.    
  29.