home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!uwm.edu!ogicse!decwrl!contessa!mwm
- From: mwm@contessa.palo-alto.ca.us (Mike Meyer)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
- Subject: Re: PL/1 non-local goto versus setjmp/longjmp
- Message-ID: <mwm.1jk3@contessa.palo-alto.ca.us>
- Date: 15 Aug 92 21:39:50 GMT
- Article-I.D.: contessa.mwm.1jk3
- References: <55930@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <1992Aug05.203238.141042@cs.cmu.edu> <1992Aug12.073130.1@zodiac.rutgers.edu> <id.VJBS.0DK@ferranti.com>
- Distribution: world
- Organization: Missionaria Phonibalonica
- Lines: 9
- X-NewsSoftware: Amiga Yarn 3.4, 1992/08/12 15:49:52
-
- In <id.VJBS.0DK@ferranti.com>, peter@ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) wrote:
- > Personally, I'd prefer if C had no goto at all, but an organized system of
- > contexts, so you could perform setjmp/longjmp operations within a routine.
-
- I'm not quite sure what you mean by "organized system of contexts"? If
- this mechanism would allows multilevel loop breaks. If not, I'd like
- more details on it.
-
- <mike
-