home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Path: sparky!uunet!microsoft!hexnut!jimad
- From: jimad@microsoft.com (Jim Adcock)
- Subject: Re: destruction of temporaries
- Message-ID: <1992Aug20.230652.19870@microsoft.com>
- Date: 20 Aug 92 23:06:52 GMT
- Organization: Microsoft Corporation
- References: <1992Aug17.211508.6634@lucid.com> <1992Aug18.205211.16789@Warren.MENTORG.COM> <TMB.92Aug19113657@arolla.idiap.ch>
- Lines: 8
-
- In article <TMB.92Aug19113657@arolla.idiap.ch> tmb@idiap.ch writes:
- |I don't want my temporaries to hang around until the end of the
- |function. I often use large temporaries (megabytes), and I see no
- |reason why they should stick around any longer than I need them.
-
- No one disagrees with this statement. The issue is when should temporaries
- be allowed to stay around any shorter than you need them.
-
-