home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!forney.berkeley.edu!jbuck
- From: jbuck@forney.berkeley.edu (Joe Buck)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Doubly-linked list trick (was Re: Garbage Collection for C++)
- Date: 19 Aug 1992 17:52:15 GMT
- Organization: U. C. Berkeley
- Lines: 16
- Message-ID: <16u1ofINNiri@agate.berkeley.edu>
- References: <16ovt2INN3nq@early-bird.think.com> <2134@appli.se> <TMB.92Aug19133241@arolla.idiap.ch>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: forney.berkeley.edu
-
- In article <TMB.92Aug19133241@arolla.idiap.ch> tmb@idiap.ch writes:
- >PS: Where was the outcry of indignation when, all of a sudden,
- >uninitialized static member definitions didn't count as definitions
- >anymore? Unlike restricting encoded pointers, this did force me to
- >change some of _my_ source code.
-
- The outcry was mainly in gnu.g++.help and gnu.g++.bug, which got a lot
- of "bug reports" and screaming when g++ implemented the new rule. Since
- the installation procedure has been cleaned up, it's been the single
- most frequently posted article.
-
-
-
-
- --
- Joe Buck jbuck@ohm.berkeley.edu
-