home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.dcom.modems:12310 biz.comp.telebit:839
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,biz.comp.telebit
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!sgi!rhyolite!vjs
- From: vjs@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com (Vernon Schryver)
- Subject: Re: WB connections with SupraFAX with v.32bis
- Message-ID: <oppp12c@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com>
- Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc. Mountain View, CA
- References: <Bt36J3.DLD@gator.rn.com> <7DFRPB4w165w@hovel.welly.gen.nz>
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 02:47:30 GMT
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <7DFRPB4w165w@hovel.welly.gen.nz>, cybapunk@hovel.welly.gen.nz (Phil Ross) writes:
- > larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
- >
- > > and one of the sites we connect to has a pair of SupraFAX v.32bis modems
- > > running SCO 3.2 release 2.0 with the DTE locked at 19200 with hardware flow
- > > control
- > > would it be possible to improve on the connection speed with LAPM? We
- > > tried it once, but throughput appeared to decrease by about 15%. I was
- > > wondering if we change the LAPM window packet from 128 bytes would we
- > > see any change in throughput?
- >
- > I get 1450+ cps with v32bis on my Supra. You should lock your DTE to 57.6k.
-
-
- 1450 Bytes/sec does not need 56K.
- 19.2 is more than enough for only 1450 B/s.
-
- The net speed to the computer might be higher at a lower DTE speed, if
- the computer is like many and has trouble keeping up at 56K.
-
- Oh, well, this is an old argument.
-
-
- Vernon Schryver, vjs@sgi.com
-