home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.cell-relay
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!mips!sdd.hp.com!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!tonyg@spock.retix.com
- From: tonyg@spock.retix.com (Tony "Salty Dog" Goulding)
- Subject: ATM signaling
- In-Reply-To: comp.dcom.cell-relay@ucs.indiana.edu's message of Thu, 13 Aug 1992 08:58:38 -0500 <199208131405.AA16055@spock.retix.com>
- Message-ID: <199208131603.AA17348@spock.retix.com>
- Sender: <tonyg@spock.retix.com>
- Organization: Indiana University
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 16:03:58 GMT
- Lines: 21
-
- > Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 08:58:38 -0500
- > From: comp.dcom.cell-relay@ucs.indiana.edu
- > Reply-To: comp.dcom.cell-relay@ucs.indiana.edu
- > Sender: cell-relay-request@indiana.edu
- > X-Originally-From: ctkosti@afterlife.ncsc.mil
- >
- > Are there any standards committees currently working on a standard for
- > signaling (call setup, teardown, etc.) in ATM networks?
- >
- > --
- > chris (ctkosti@afterlife.ncsc.mil)
- >
- I get the impression that the ATM Forum is moving towards the use of
- Q.931 for signalling. I know of at least one commercial product that
- will be implementing signalling in this way.
- Tony.
-
- ==================================================================
- Q: What is the difference between LA and yoghurt?
- A: One is cultured...
- ==================================================================
-