home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!mips!darwin.sura.net!Sirius.dfn.de!zrz.tu-berlin.de!math.fu-berlin.de!news.netmbx.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!sun4nl!alchemy!accucx!nevries
- From: nevries@accucx.cc.ruu.nl (Nico E de Vries)
- Newsgroups: comp.compression
- Subject: Re: Wanted: News about ARJ 2.40 (or ARJ 3.00)
- Message-ID: <2995@accucx.cc.ruu.nl>
- Date: 19 Aug 92 13:50:33 GMT
- References: <16847AF90.B249236@vmtecqro.qro.itesm.mx>
- Organization: Academic Computer Centre Utrecht
- Lines: 37
-
- In <16847AF90.B249236@vmtecqro.qro.itesm.mx> B249236@vmtecqro.qro.itesm.mx (Elite of the NetWork) writes:
-
- >I want to know what happened with arj 2.40. The last version (2.30) is dated
- >from january, and some people said that arj 2.40 will be out by march. Well
- >we are in august and arj 2.40 is not out yet.
- >
- > Some pleople also said thats because arj will try to beat pkzip 2.0 when
- >it comes out, but i'm getting a little tired of wait. With all these delays,
-
- Excactly. ARJ will be released after PKZIP 2.0.
-
- >I think arj must be named 3.00 instead of 2.40.
-
- Version number is a matter of features, not of release date.
-
- >So, what happened with arj? Is arj no longer suported, or must we wait until
- >vaporware pkzip 2.0 is out?
-
- PKZIP 2.0 will be released first week of september. ARJ will be close
- behind it.
-
- >
- > Thanks in advance
- >
- >
- >
- >P.S. Sorry, my english is not very good. No punt intended.
-
-
- Nico E. de Vries
- _ _
- O O USENET nevries@cc.ruu.nl FIDO 2:281/708.1 COMPUSERVE "soon" ????
- o This text reflects MY opinions, not that of my employer BITECH.
- \_/ This text is supplied 'AS IS', no waranties of any kind apply.
- Don't waste your time on complaining about my hopeless typostyle.
-
- "I would admit my mistakes, if I had any ..." (Bumper Sticker)
-