home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.arch
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!news.cs.indiana.edu!umn.edu!sctc.com!smith
- From: smith@sctc.com (Rick Smith)
- Subject: Re: A Little History
- Message-ID: <1992Aug21.195858.24945@sctc.com>
- Organization: SCTC
- References: <1478@seqp4.sequoia.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 19:58:58 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- I agree with the opinions at the beginning of this thread. I missed the
- original post that suggested there's "too much" history being thrown
- about here and I'd like to further disabuse the notion.
-
- While it's nice to have history provide the personal touch
- (associating a person with a concept) history is especially
- significant in computer architecture because many of the concepts
- don't really become obsolete. It's amazing how much of it is
- independent of the implementation technology. In other words, things
- that worked in tube machines are still being used in VLSI. Sometimes
- the only published example of a technique is a historic example, since
- today's vendors don't always describe things in as much detail as we
- might need. In other cases, "everybody" knows about various classic
- examples (Illiac IV for multiprocessing, Cray for vector registers,
- B5000 for "thunks") and the peculiarities of the implementation point
- the rest of us in particular directions as a result.
-
- What goes around comes around. So it's good to know what's coming.
-
- As for the purely historical things (i.e. how fast were the dinosaurs)
- I haven't noticed that much traffic in proportion to everything else.
- Besides, alt.folklore.computers carries most of that stuff.
-
- Rick.
- smith@sctc.com arden hills, minnesota
-