home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.arch:8876 alt.folklore.computers:12476
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!neat.cs.toronto.edu!hugh
- Newsgroups: comp.arch,alt.folklore.computers
- From: hugh@cs.toronto.edu ("D. Hugh Redelmeier")
- Subject: Re: Babbage books (was: Proposal: Computer History Project)
- Message-ID: <92Aug13.000135edt.47992@neat.cs.toronto.edu>
- Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
- References: <1351@eouk9.eoe.co.uk> <BsJ7xy.40L@pgroup.com> <1992Aug6.141925.9517@csi.on.ca> <1992Aug6.165351.8708@pollux.lu.se> <1992Aug7.175715.24828@geovision.gvc.com> <4023@novavax.UUCP> <samw.713392337@bucket> <1992Aug11.134401.26906@grmbl.saar.de>
- Date: 13 Aug 92 04:01:49 GMT
- Lines: 39
-
- me@grmbl.saar.de (Martin Emmerich) writes:
- | He also didn't use asynchronous counters (I mean that the force,
- | you use to turn in the lowest number wheel gets used to turn the
- | whole bank of wheels if you have a carry which propagates from
- | the lowest to the highest decimal). This gets important if you
- | have a very big number of decimals (his universal machine had
- | about fifty). All tolerances add together and the wheels get
- | stuck.
-
- I happened to be in the Science Museum in London last week, looking
- at bits of Babbage engines. I didn't know that there would be a
- quiz, so I paid insufficient attention. Here is what I think I
- remember:
- - the carry-outs were stored in a per-digit register
- - a subsequent step did the carry-in
- - the whole set of carry-in operations were done with one rotation
- of a shaft.
- - BUT the carry-ins were not processed simultaneously -- they were
- staggered, taking a certain number of degrees of the rotation.
- Clearly, the low-order carry-ins were handled first.
- - It would seem that this would limit the number of digits in a
- register -- how many degrees were needed for each operation?
- 50 digit registers seemed to work, if I remember correctly.
-
- There was a whole display about this. It claimed that Babbage was
- proud of this particular structure. I would have been too.
-
- On another point, it seemed as Babbage's mechanic was important. I
- don't remember the details precisely, but:
- - he could build *very* well
- - he could draught well
- - few people had both of these skills
- - he charged a lot, but was worth it (details of a suit with another employer)
- - he broke with Babbage something like ten years into their work
-
- Hugh Redelmeier
- hugh@mimosa.com or {utcsri, yunexus, utzoo, scocan}!redvax!hugh
- When all else fails: hugh@csri.toronto.edu
- +1 416 482-8253
-