home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!AERO.ORG!MARKEN
- X-Delivery-Notice: SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
- Posted-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 92 10:01:51 PDT
- Message-ID: <199208221701.AA07376@aerospace.aero.org>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.csg-l
- Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 10:01:51 PDT
- Sender: "Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)" <CSG-L@UIUCVMD.BITNET>
- From: marken@AERO.ORG
- Subject: politics and PCT
- Lines: 69
-
- [From Rick Marken (920822.1000)]
-
- Why do I feel like Peter being patiently corrected (as usual)
- by Jesus? I spew a little sarcastic spleen and my mentor gently
- points out that I am tilting at categories -- just like the
- targets of my tilt.
-
- But my little tilt might have served a purpose, viz., re-starting a
- dialog on (and, possibly, some exporation of) those "higher levels"
- of control that we all know and love.
-
- Bill Powers (920822.0800) says:
-
- >One would think that this principle
- >would lead to great tolerance of others and the realization that a
- >belief is, after all, only a belief, not knowledge. Apparently,
- >however, it leads in the opposite direction. The assumption is often
- >that the way I was raised is the right way, and everyone else is
- >misguided, perverted, ignorant, or evil.
-
- Excellent point. Why, indeed, might this be the case -- from a PCT
- perspective? How might one be able to help a person see this --
- before he or she dispatchs you to allah, ships you to a concentration
- camp, fires you from your job or votes for people who will push
- laws that keep you out of the community?
-
- >Politics is fertile ground for a control theorist. What's needed is a
- >study in depth of many individuals who call themselves by some party
- >label. What are they controlling for? What principles do they uphold,
- >and what methods do these principles justify? What kinds of errors do
- >they perceive in various social situations, and how do they see their
- >proposed actions as correcting those errors? What do they think of as
- >the good life? As being a good person? How do they think people work,
- >with respect to rewards and punishments, self-interest, social
- >interest, and so on?
-
- Maybe we could get a volunteer "republican" from the audience?
- I don't call myself by any party label but I would be willing
- to by analyzed as a member of the PCT party -- indeed, I think
- there are what would be called "politcal" implications of PCT;
- maybe that's what I'm trying to get us to discuss -- the socio-
- political implications of the PCT model of human nature.
-
- >Once the real reasons for failure of our social systems
- >were brought out, perhaps the way to a better solution to our problems
- >would become more apparent. It isn't that social problems are so
- >difficult. It's that our approach to them is confused and self-
- >defeating.
-
- Yes, the solution to our social problems are simple -- just like
- the solution to our personal problems (internal conflicts). It's
- just a slight change in the rate of firing of a reference neuron
- or two. But, as people who are in conflict know (at least, symtom-
- atically), that little change is very difficult to make when you
- try to change it at the level of the conflict itself; control
- systems are VERY tenacious.
-
- Best regards
-
- Rick
-
-
- **************************************************************
-
- Richard S. Marken USMail: 10459 Holman Ave
- The Aerospace Corporation Los Angeles, CA 90024
- E-mail: marken@aero.org
- (310) 336-6214 (day)
- (310) 474-0313 (evening)
-