home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: vmsnet.pdp-11
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!torn!watserv2.uwaterloo.ca!watdragon.uwaterloo.ca!kcwellsc
- From: kcwellsc@watdragon.uwaterloo.ca (Ken Wellsch)
- Subject: Re: MIPS
- Message-ID: <C19JMI.BHE@watdragon.uwaterloo.ca>
- Organization: University of Waterloo
- References: <9301211714.AA17594@eye.psych.umn.edu> <1993Jan22.024906.8303@cs.cornell.edu>
- Distribution: na
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 16:11:03 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- > If you wouldn't mind typing it in, I'd appreciate seeing that little
- > chart, and wonder if others do also.
-
- Although some people do not think much of synthetic benchmarks like
- dhrystone, I like it for two reasons - it's used extensively on small
- systems and more importantly, like any good scientific experiment, it
- can be verified/tested/refuted by anyone else because you can just run
- the benchmark yourself (if you can compile it 8-)
-
- Here are a few of the runs I've done (and remembered to document):
-
- Dhrystone 2.0 measurments (highest dhrystones/second)
-
- 331 Pro350 (F11 chip) (Venix 1.1)
- 585 Pro380 (J11 chip) (Venix 1.1)
- 714 LSI-11/73 (Ultrix 3.0)
- 857 PDP-11/44 (Ultrix 3.0)
-
- I will have to check but I believe I got around 500 on a true blue
- IBM XT running at 4.77MHz just for comparison.
-