home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!mccall!ipmdf-newsgate!list
- Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.pmdf
- Subject: NOTES channel and FWD:
- Message-ID: <01GTSMV4UGS894E6D6@camb.com>
- From: Bob Tinkelman <bob@camb.com>
- Date: 21 Jan 1993 21:32:17 -0500 (EST)
- Organization: Cambridge Computer Associates, Inc.
- Return-Path: <epmdf@YMIR.CLAREMONT.EDU>
- Resent-Date: 21 Jan 1993 21:32:17 -0500 (EST)
- Resent-From: epmdf@YMIR.CLAREMONT.EDU
- Errors-To: epmdf@YMIR.CLAREMONT.EDU
- Resent-Message-ID: <01GTSK5CEPUQ94DNLW@INNOSOFT.COM>
- X-Vms-To: IN%INFO-PMDF
- X-Vms-Cc: TINKELMAN
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
- Lines: 10
-
- We use the PMDF NOTES channel at eisner.decus.org to populate a
- conference from the info-multinet list. Lately we've reveived
- a number of items with subjects that look like:
- FWD: RE: some earlier subject
-
- These don't get matched up with the earlier notes with subjects
- RE: some earlier subject
-
- Would it be reasonable for the NOTES channel to treat FWD in the
- same manner as it treats RE?
-