home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!opl.com!hri.com!noc.near.net!news.Brown.EDU!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!math.fu-berlin.de!news.netmbx.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!sunic!sics.se!ag
- From: ag@sics.se (Anders G|ransson)
- Newsgroups: talk.philosophy.misc
- Subject: Re: Grounding morals
- Message-ID: <AG.93Jan26212855@anhur.sics.se>
- Date: 26 Jan 93 20:28:55 GMT
- References: <1993Jan26.032035.13300@news.eng.convex.com>
- <C1G6Ct.HJ8@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <AG.93Jan26133304@anhur.sics.se>
- <C1Gw39.553@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
- Sender: news@sics.se
- Organization: GRAMMA
- Lines: 81
- In-Reply-To: jwales@silver.ucs.indiana.edu's message of Tue, 26 Jan 1993 15:23:29 GMT
-
- In article <C1Gw39.553@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> jwales@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Jimmy -Jimbo- Wales) writes:
-
- JW > Not directly, not immediately, not individually, of course. But
- > intellectual arguments play a strong role in shaping culture, law,
- > etc. If there is a failure among intellectuals (philosophers) in
- > defending (for example) the fundamental value of life, then a direct
- > result may be: Nazi gas chambers. We've seen it happen.
- >
- >
-
-
- AG >I don't know if it is in any way related to this issue but I
- >once read a serie of interesting comments on this matter by
- >Heisenberg (who lived in Germany during the second world war).
- >He suggested that intellectual arguments was part of the problem
- >and that morality must be based in something beyond rational
- >arguments.
-
-
- JW: Then Heisenberg was just as much of an (intellectual) victim of the
- doctrines he had taught as were the Nazis.
-
-
- I have some trouble 'parsing' (I've seen "parsing" used this way
- on usenet, but it is perhaps not the word I want) your sentence
- above.
-
- A) What is meant by "the doctrines he (Heisenberg) had taught"?
- Do you mean that Heisenberg was a victim (Intellectual) of some
- doctrine he himself had taught? What was this doctrine?
-
- B) Do you mean that the Nazis were victims of some doctrine that
- Heisenberg had taught?
-
- JW: I know of no plausible view of rationality that would lead one
- to think that the Nazis were _rational_!
-
- Maybe "plausible" is the key word here? What I take Heisenberg
- to mean is that in the intellectual sphere everything can be
- thrown around. Perhaps the fact that he partoke in the arguable
- most far reaching change of perspective in physics there have
- been made him sensitive to this view.
- Or maybe he heard the 'arguments' of lebensraum, the German
- superiority e t c phrased in the most rational fashion.
-
-
- JW: It is precisely the placing of morality beyond rational
- arguments that opens the door for the only known alternative: brute
- force. That is, if reason (i.e. discussion, debate, and the virtues
- of tolerance presumed by the process) is abandoned, then what other
- path is open?
-
-
- I my memory serves me Heisenberg continued his (beautiful)
- metaphor by saying that when the compass responds to nothing
- outside the ship of steel then you have to navigate by the
- stars.
- If one believes that morality is outside rationality the fight
- against brute force has to be conducted outside of rationality,
- i.e not by arguing against it and yet *not* by using brute force
- either.
-
-
- >Now, I hope I haven't 'put my foot in my mouth' or whatever way
- >the English proverb has it.
-
- No, I don't think so. The comment was interesting.
-
-
- Thank you.
-
- best regards Anders
-
-
-
-
-
- --
-
-
- If you see Saint Annie, please tell her - Thanks a lot.
-