home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: soc.singles
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!pacbell.com!sgiblab!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!caen!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!agate!stanford.edu!nntp.Stanford.EDU!rna
- From: rna@leland.Stanford.EDU (Robert Ashcroft)
- Subject: Re: Companion
- Message-ID: <1993Jan28.030314.12784@leland.Stanford.EDU>
- Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News)
- Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
- References: <1993Jan26.193443.7161@doug.cae.wisc.edu> <1993Jan27.023644.5026@leland.Stanford.EDU> <1993Jan28.134142.1@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 93 03:03:14 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <1993Jan28.134142.1@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz> quirke_a@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz writes:
- >rna@leland.Stanford.EDU (Robert Ashcroft) writes:
- >
- >> But you are bad poster. Personals go in alt.personals. The purpose of
- >> soc.singles has never been divined, but if it were to be, it would immediately
- >> be replaced by something even more odd.
- >
- > Some, of course, believe this has already happened...
- >
- > (but everyone was too busy flaming to notice 8-) )
-
- No, I noticed. It was in late 1986 when net.singles was replaced by
- soc.singles. The question is when will it happen again?
-
- RNA
-
-
-