home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!barry
- From: barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry)
- Newsgroups: soc.singles
- Subject: Re: Credibility and Trueness
- Message-ID: <1993Jan25.202114.1328@netcom.com>
- Date: 25 Jan 93 20:21:14 GMT
- Article-I.D.: netcom.1993Jan25.202114.1328
- References: <ewright.727932461@convex.convex.com> <1993Jan25.051224.25468@netcom.com> <ewright.727981082@convex.convex.com>
- Organization: QQQCLC
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <ewright.727981082@convex.convex.com> ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:
- >In <1993Jan25.051224.25468@netcom.com> barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry) writes:
- >> Seems Charlie owes me a sheepskin. Ed, here's your clue: 4 dates
- >>does not constitute a relationship,
- >
- >The dictionary defines relationship as follows: a romantic or
- >passionate attachment. No mention of time.
-
- So go beat off with a dictionary. Any normal human being could
- probably figure out for himself that there's a qualitative difference
- between going out with someone 4 times, and having a major involvement.
- And if he couldn't, having that fact confirmed for him by more
- experienced parties should do the trick.
-
- >You shouldn't try using big words like that unless you know
- >what they mean.
-
- Ed, go fuck yourself; no one else will.
-
- Kayembee
-