home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!turing.toronto.edu!ron
- Newsgroups: soc.singles
- From: ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels)
- Subject: Re: Honesty, Your word, and Trust -- a crisis?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan25.154347.580@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu>
- Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
- References: <JMD.93Jan22123711@lion.bear.com> <1993Jan23.184427.29810@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: 25 Jan 93 20:43:47 GMT
- Lines: 28
-
- margoli@watson.IBM.com (Larry Margolis) writes:
- >If I say I'll meet someone at noon, but I have a flat tire and I'm a
- >few minutes late, I don't think any reasonable person would say I've
- >broken my word.
- > ...
- >And unless the person to whom this is said is an anal-retentive git,
- >they'll say "that's OK", meaning that they understand that the first
- >person made the attempt to do what they said they would, but events
- >beyond their control conspired to foil their best effort.
-
- Ok, so let's play with this a moment, shall we? How about if I was late
- because "there was an accident that backed up traffic"? How about if it
- was during rush hour, where such events are relatively common?
-
- If I >really< wanted to be on time, I would allocate plenty of extra time
- to cover possible contingencies. Obviously, not everything rates this
- "best effort". For most things, I will make a trade-off between how much
- I want to be on time, how much time I'm willing to waste by being early,
- and what the probabilities are of needing "contingency time".
-
- Now, Josh Diamond will contend that I'm being dishonest because I promise
- to be on time, but don't put forth my "best effort". I can accept that.
- However, most people (in my experience) will only be upset if there is a
- disagreement as to the importance of the meeting, and therefore feel that
- I should have allocated more contingency time.
-
- --
- Ron Wessels University of Toronto ron@turing.toronto.edu
-