home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: soc.singles
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!aahz
- From: aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine)
- Subject: Re: Credibility and Trueness
- Message-ID: <1993Jan25.192511.25927@netcom.com>
- Organization: Don't blame me, I voted for Bill 'n' Opus
- References: <ewright.727932461@convex.convex.com> <1993Jan25.051224.25468@netcom.com> <ewright.727981082@convex.convex.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 19:25:11 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- In article <ewright.727981082@convex.convex.com> ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:
- >In <1993Jan25.051224.25468@netcom.com> barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry) writes:
- >
- >> Seems Charlie owes me a sheepskin. Ed, here's your clue: 4 dates
- >>does not constitute a relationship,
- >
- >No, but it seems you do qualify for a degree from the Jimmy Dutton
- >School of Reading Comprehension.
- >
- >The dictionary defines relationship as follows: a romantic or
- >passionate attachment. No mention of time.
- >
- >You shouldn't try using big words like that unless you know
- >what they mean.
-
- Neither should you. I strongly doubt that anyone here would call
- Unrequited Love a Relationship, yet the dictionary definition would seem
- to allow that.
-
- Shut up, Ed. Just shut up.
- --
- --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
- @netcom.com
-
- Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
-
- Kinky vanilla queer het
-