home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: soc.singles
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!nntp.Stanford.EDU!rna
- From: rna@leland.Stanford.EDU (Robert Ashcroft)
- Subject: Re: Flirting How To Guide/Backrubs
- Message-ID: <1993Jan24.063015.29063@leland.Stanford.EDU>
- Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News)
- Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
- References: <JULIE.93Jan22134337@cucbs.chem.columbia.edu> <1993Jan23.003333.18031@leland.Stanford.EDU> <1993Jan23.155401.8134@netcom.com>
- Distribution: soc
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 93 06:30:15 GMT
- Lines: 31
-
- In article <1993Jan23.155401.8134@netcom.com> aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine) writes:
- >In article <1993Jan23.003333.18031@leland.Stanford.EDU> rna@leland.Stanford.EDU (Robert Ashcroft) writes:
- >>
- >>Excellent. Here I've been feeling inadequate, listening to Aahz and the
- >>others extoll the virtues of backrubs. I've disliked them ever since I
- >>was a kid. My brother loved it, but I'd just squirm out of the way.
- >>I don't suppose I actively dislike it anymore. Don't understand it is more
- >>like it.
- >>
- >>I'd like to come out as a take-it-or-leave-it-backrub sort of guy.
- >
- >Please note that in my original article, I said the following:
- >
- >"Would you like your feet rubbed?" At this point, if she's completely
- >uninterested, and doesn't offer any alternative, you're probably better
- >off finding someone else (assuming your taste in physical contact is
- >similar to mine).
- >
-
- Hello? So what? My comment was entirely in response to J. Wright's
- remark that backrubs didn't do _her_ any particular good. Which is why
- I modified the subject and cut out all previous exchanges of the thread.
- Threads drift.
-
- In no way am I accusing Aahz of foisting backrubs on unwilling recipients.
-
- Although it is sort of amusing to imagine such a scene...
-
- No, NO! Not a backrub! ANYTHING but a backrub! Aieeeeeeeee!
-
- RNA
-