home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!emory!gatech!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!stanford.edu!apple!goofy!mumbo.apple.com!gallant.apple.com!mcmelmon.apple.com!user
- From: mattm@apple.com (Matthew Melmon)
- Newsgroups: soc.motss
- Subject: Re: Audrey (and Katharine)
- Message-ID: <mattm-280193094747@mcmelmon.apple.com>
- Date: 28 Jan 93 17:50:36 GMT
- References: <74199@cup.portal.com> <1jr4iqINNdhv@mizar.usc.edu> <PC.93Jan27183852@bacon.linus.mitre.org>
- Sender: news@gallant.apple.com
- Followup-To: soc.motss
- Organization: Apple Computer, Inc.
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <PC.93Jan27183852@bacon.linus.mitre.org>, pc@linus.mitre.org
- (Penny Chase) wrote:
-
- > Au contraire! Katharine Hepburn is as convincing
- > a Southern grande dame as I would be. She's pretty
- > good in Summertime, now that I think of it. The
- > rest of the time, though, it's all variations on
- > the one character she *can* play convincingly: herself.
-
- You are saying that "Bringing Up Baby," "Long Day's Journey Into
- Night," The Lion in Winter," "Summertime," "Rooster Cogburn,"
- and "On Godlen Pond" are all variations on *one* characterization?
-
- Nonsense.
-
- Katharine Hepburn is a great movie star *and* a great actress,
- and is fulling deserving of the recognition she has received.
-
- *X*
-