home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!opl.com!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnewsm!cbnewsl!ry
- From: ry@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (ryerson.schwark)
- Newsgroups: soc.motss
- Subject: Re: Soc.motss Reorganization - VOTING BEGINS!
- Message-ID: <1993Jan27.161754.11415@cbnewsl.cb.att.com>
- Date: 27 Jan 93 16:17:54 GMT
- References: <1993Jan26.165125.19353@exu.ericsson.se> <C1I616.JL8@unix.amherst.edu>
- Sender: ry@usl.com
- Organization: UNIX System Laboratories, Summit, NJ
- Lines: 18
-
- In article <C1I616.JL8@unix.amherst.edu> twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:
- >In article <1993Jan26.165125.19353@exu.ericsson.se> exukev@exu.ericsson.se (Kevin Autrey) writes:
- >
- >>From: jefu@jupiter.nmt.edu (Jeff Putnam)
- >>
- >>soc.motss - mostly because of historical tradition, also because
- >>soc.gay wont appear to be women inclusive, and soc.lesbigay will
- >>invite bi postings which belong for the most part in soc.bi.
- >
- >Do you mean "postings from bis," or "postings on specifically
- >bi-related topics?" If the former, I don't understand why you don't
- >suggest that the women just take all their traffic to SAPPHO.
- >
- Actually, I hope it does both.
-
- Ry
- ry@usl.com
- Hoping to get bi marketshare in motss/lesbigay/queer
-