home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky soc.motss:58345 soc.bi:19104 alt.sex.motss:2271 alt.support:1647
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!charnel!rat!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!dbrownfi
- From: dbrownfi@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Doug Brownfield)
- Newsgroups: soc.motss,soc.bi,alt.sex.motss,alt.support
- Subject: Re: HIV-negative survey (repost)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan25.160728.8918@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
- Date: 25 Jan 93 16:07:28 GMT
- References: <C12w27.J8n@world.std.com> <74177@cup.portal.com>
- Sender: news@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
- Organization: The Ohio State University
- Lines: 12
- Nntp-Posting-Host: top.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
-
- In article <74177@cup.portal.com> Arthur_T_Hu@cup.portal.com writes:
- >If you value your life, do not ever dare to suggest reducing the
- >number of partners as a strategy to remain HIV free. To do so is
- >homophobic, judgemental, and immoral. To cite studies that show
- >the relationship between number of partners and HIV rate is also
- >immoral. Do not discourage sex, or imply that there is such a thing
- >as excessive amounts of sex. Just make sure you use condoms 100% of
- >the time, and pray that the AIDS failure rate is better than the 10%
- >pregnacy failure rate for condoms.
-
- ...well..at least you're getting closer to something with which I can agree..
- like the dramatic touch...
-