home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky soc.motss:58257 alt.sex.motss:2261
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!news.umbc.edu!nobody
- From: ac999273@umbc.edu (ac999273)
- Newsgroups: soc.motss,alt.sex.motss
- Subject: Re: Mailing bricks, etc. (Was: Re: Fighting fundies)
- Date: 24 Jan 1993 13:02:39 -0500
- Organization: University of Maryland, Baltimore County Campus
- Lines: 19
- Message-ID: <1juljvINNasb@umbc8.umbc.edu>
- References: <C1BK58.BI3@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <C1BKvo.Kq6@cs.columbia.edu> <74232@cup.portal.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: umbc8.umbc.edu
-
- In article <74232@cup.portal.com> Furr@cup.portal.com (George Dalton Madison) writes:
- >Carson A. Gaspar writes:
- >>On the other hand, my favorite technique is to take all of those
- >>postage-paid cards, and put them in the mail -- completely blank.
- >>They receive them in the pristene condition (not counting the USPS) in
- >>which they were delivered. This is (as far as I know -
- >>#include <stddisclaimer.h>) legal and costs them postage and sorting
- >>time. Why should _I_ deal with recycling all those cards - let _them_
- >>do it!
- >
- I think it would be very educational for them if we all took
- Polaroids the next time we make love, and send them in the buisiness
- reply mail envelopes.
- Granted, this is to easy a way to get caught (They would know
- what you look like!). So, perhaps if we just send them porn magazine
- excerpts, it would do the trick.
-
-
-
-