home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: soc.motss
- Path: sparky!uunet!world!ckp
- From: ckp@world.std.com (Charles K Polisher)
- Subject: Re: safe sex question
- Message-ID: <C1C4zA.3xn@world.std.com>
- Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
- References: <1jegfnINNl37@meaddata.meaddata.com> <C12DpJ.EDz@agora.rain.com> <1993Jan22.054354.12531@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <1993Jan23.021625.18770@reed.edu>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 01:47:33 GMT
- Lines: 28
-
- nelson@reed.edu (Nelson Minar) writes:
-
- >Chuck, Thanks for the thorough article on HIV transmission via oral
- >sex. If you're interested in the question, but skipped the article
- >because it was long, go back and reread it.
-
- >I have two questions:
-
- >Your post is biased unprotected oral sex is more-or-less safe. I say
- >this because your messages is largely readable as a justification for
- >cocksucking without a condom. Did you come to this conclusion because
- >you objectively thought it was true, or were you hoping to find it was
- >the case, or... ? I don't mean to offend by asking this question, but
- >the topic of HIV infection is so sensitive that it seems appropriate.
-
- >Are these guys for real? :
- >>"Avoid all sexual contact." (U S Centers for Disease Control,
- >>recorded information hotline, Atlanta, 3/87)
- > __
- >nelson@reed.edu \/ When you expect flutes, it's whistles
-
- Nelson--
- I believe I faithfully accumulated all that is known on the subject and
- presented it in the most logical sequence. If you feel the material draws
- a conclusion then perhaps it "speaks for itself". I reviewed my interpre-
- tations of the research with the authors to ensure accuracy.
- Regards, Chuck (303) 455-1280
-
-