home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: soc.motss
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!pacbell.com!rjwill6
- From: rjwill6@pbsdts.sdcrc.pacbell.com (Rod Williams)
- Subject: "No Wavering on Gay Soldiers"
- Message-ID: <1993Jan21.160714.12733@PacBell.COM>
- Originator: rjwill6@pbsdts.sdcrc.pacbell.com
- Sender: news@PacBell.COM (Pacific Bell Netnews)
- Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, California
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 16:07:14 GMT
- Lines: 75
-
-
- Yesterday's (01/20/93 -- Inauguration Day) New York Times
- ran this editorial, reprinted here without permission...
-
- ---------------------------------------------------
-
- In the heat of the campaign, Bill Clinton pledged to issue
- an executive order to repeal the ban on gay men and lesbians
- in the military services. The pledge was not made lightly.
- Mr. Clinton was courting the votes and contributions of
- homosexuals -- and the approbation of all fair-minded
- Americans distressed at discrimination and gay-bashing in
- all areas of society.
-
- But now Mr. Clinton is meeting stiff resistance from
- military leaders and soldiers in the ranks. Some top
- generals fear that open acceptance of homosexuals will
- destroy morale and discipline. Many officers seem to have a
- visceral aversion to homosexuals.
-
- Top aides to Mr. Clinton are suggesting that he pass the
- buck to his choice for Defense Secretary, Les Aspin, who
- could take the heat for lifting the ban and work closely
- with the military to ease the transition. Under one
- approach, Mr. Clinton would issue written instructions to
- Mr. Aspin telling *him* to lift the ban, drop all
- investigations and disciplinary cases against suspected
- homosexuals, and end the practice of asking recruits about
- their sexual orientation.
-
- This is a tempting scenario that might allow Mr. Clinton to
- have it both ways. He could honor the spirit of his pledge
- by having the ban lifted. Yet he might spare himself the
- personal fury of military leaders whose cooperation he needs
- to reshape the armed forces and cope with foreign crises.
- Some Clinton supporters are also arguing that this is not an
- issue worth fighting about in the early days of a new
- administration with more important priorities.
-
- But a contentious civil rights issue like this is not
- appropriate for buck-passing. If social change is to occur
- against widespread opposition, it is best ordered from the
- very top, carrying the weight and moral authority of the
- Presidency.
-
- Mr. Clinton needs to proceed with his original plan to issue
- an executive order. He could lift the ban on homosexuals
- immediately while granting the military time to devise new
- policies, if needed, governing housing, gay social clubs,
- dependents' benefits and other issues.
-
- Issuing an executive order would also uphold the principle
- that the President controls the military, not vice versa. It
- would honor a highly visible campaign pledge at a time when
- Mr. Clinton us waffling on all too many pledges. And it
- would signal determination to head off expected attempts by
- conservatives in Congress to maintain the ban.
-
- The nation is ready for this change. Polls show that a
- majority of Americans favor admission of homosexuals. If Mr.
- Clinton backs off now, he will only invite a backlash against
- gay servicemen and his own enlightened effort to promote
- fairness.
-
- When a courageous former President, Harry Truman, racially
- integrated the armed forces in 1948, he did so by executive
- order. But then he was famous for knowing where the buck
- stopped.
-
- --------------- end of editorial ------------------
-
- --
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
- rod williams -=- pacific bell -=- san ramon, ca -=- rjwill6@pacbell.com
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-