home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!newsserver.jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!msuinfo!msuinfo!news
- From: kamchar@ibm.cl.msu.edu (SunCat)
- Newsgroups: soc.men
- Subject: Re: Deep Thoughts?
- Message-ID: <1k2752INNedf@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu>
- Date: 26 Jan 93 02:20:18 GMT
- References: <Jan.20.17.24.56.1993.379@net.bio.net>
- Organization: Michigan State University
- Lines: 55
- NNTP-Posting-Host: isnext15.cl.msu.edu
-
- In article <Jan.20.17.24.56.1993.379@net.bio.net> charleen@net.bio.net
- (Charleen Bunjiovianna) writes:
- > In article <1jfhnvINNf7l@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> kamchar@ibm.cl.msu.edu
- (SunCat) writes:
- > >In article <1993Jan15.143757.17151@walter.cray.com> jsw@cray.com (Jon
- S.
- > >Wood) writes:
- > >[...]
- > >> It's a CRIME that women should have so many more options regarding
- > >> parenthood, abortion, adoption and or custody and not one of the
- options
- > >> contains her wallet.
- > >
- > >Power and responsibility must go together. Otherwise there is
- injustice.
- >
- > It's surprising, though gratifying, to see you agree with Jon.
- >
- > So, how are we going to see to it that women don't shirk the
- responsibility
- > that comes with the power they have? How do we rectify the injustices
- brought
- > about by women abusing their power?
- >
- > Charleen
- Hmm. That's a tough one. The stuff of many threads--most of which belong
- in alt.abortion.inequity . I suppose we could put a stop to "I decide but
- you pay" but what of the cases already decided? Seems our society thinks
- that women should be baby machines and men should be labor machines.
- While I think that the practice of reducing men to military-industrial
- robots could be solved with advanced robotics in production (just my crank
- economic theory) women would receive divident income too (under James S.
- Albus's plan. See _Peoples' Capitalism: the Economics of the Robot
- Revolution_). So why would they need a man to economicly support their
- decision with cash?
-
- A lawyer fellow emailed me re: *cesant rationi* and torts. In other words
- if a law no longer has a reason it doesn't hold & if someone hurts you you
- can sue.
-
- In article 80K@world.std.com, aep@world.std.com (Andrew E Page) writes:
- >
- > According to a good friend's girlfriend:
- >
- >It's a CRIME that it is easier for some "men" to give a woman a child
- >than it is to give her an orgasm. One can happen by mistake, but the
- >other requires only fifteen seconds more thought, just a little more
- >effort, and just slightly more heart.
-
- Yeah but which takes a mistake and which requires thought and heart?
- :-)
-
- =========SunCat++++ | kamchar@ibm.cl.msu.edu
- "Practice Random Kindness and Senseless Acts of Beauty"
- --Anne Herbert
-