home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky soc.men:23194 alt.abortion.inequity:6703 alt.feminism:7585
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!castor.cs.psu.edu!beaver
- From: beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver)
- Newsgroups: soc.men,alt.abortion.inequity,alt.feminism
- Subject: Re: Privacy -- and responsibility
- Message-ID: <C1D6ss.8tJ@cs.psu.edu>
- Date: 24 Jan 93 15:24:28 GMT
- References: <1ji8gqINNg2i@gap.caltech.edu> <C1Boz1.C11@cs.psu.edu> <1jssrgINNkni@gap.caltech.edu>
- Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
- Organization: Penn State Computer Science
- Lines: 27
- Nntp-Posting-Host: castor.cs.psu.edu
-
- peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
- >beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
- >
- >>peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
- >>>beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
- >>>
- >>>>Men have sex, flee the scene, come back for a few privileges,
- >>>>then skip out. They have no obligations. Women who use no
- >>>>birth control and then have abortions are bearing responsibilities;
- >>>>men who use birth control which fails are "responsibility-free."
- >>>
- >>>Yes, that is a big part of my argument as pertains to the case where
- >>>no child is born. If a child *is* born it gets more complicated
- >>>that that because one must consider the rights of the child to be
- >>>cared for and supported.
- >
- >>I am speechless in the face of such unabashed sexism. At least
- >>it's better than hypocritical sexism. All IMO.
- >
- >Don, would you like to explain to me exactly what it is about
- >my statement that you consider "unabashed sexism"?
-
- If you can't see it, I would just be wasting my time. Sorry,
-
- Don
- --
- beaver@cs.psu.edu Opinions from the PC-challenged
-