home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky soc.men:23189 alt.abortion.inequity:6698 alt.dads-rights:3478
- Newsgroups: soc.men,alt.abortion.inequity,alt.dads-rights
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!psuvax1!castor.cs.psu.edu!beaver
- From: beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver)
- Subject: Re: adoption rules
- Message-ID: <C1D3yD.7At@cs.psu.edu>
- Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: castor.cs.psu.edu
- References: <1jnmblINNlqn@gap.caltech.edu> <C1BL79.9nz@cs.psu.edu> <1jss5tINNkd2@gap.caltech.edu>
- Distribution: na
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 14:23:01 GMT
- Lines: 33
-
- peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
- >beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
- >
- >>peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
- >>>beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
- >
- >>Now, Michal, what do *you* propose?
- >
- >Don, I've thought about it alot this weekend. I've concluded that
- >the *good* of protecting the father's right to stop an adoption is not
- >worth the *bad* of subjecting the mother and child to the risk of
- >injury from an abusive father. Thus I cannot condone a legal
- >requirement for paternal notification.
-
- Fine. Will you legally permit a father to abduct a child and disappear
- if he knows the mother to be abusive?
-
- Do you condone a legal requirement to inform a mother where her child is?
-
-
- After all, is the *good* of protecting the mother's parental rights
- worth the *bad* of subjecting the child and father to the risk of
- inquiry from an abusive mother?
-
-
- Don't hide behind "mothers don't abuse children," Michal. You've read
- this newsgroup enough to have seen the statistics -- and Cal Tech isn't
- *that* much of an ivory tower. Will we see another sophomoric smokescreen
- to hide your anti-father sentiments?
-
- Don
- --
- beaver@cs.psu.edu Opinions from the PC-challenged
-