home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky soc.men:23166 alt.abortion.inequity:6682 alt.dads-rights:3474
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!nntp-server.caltech.edu!peri
- From: peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri)
- Newsgroups: soc.men,alt.abortion.inequity,alt.dads-rights
- Subject: Re: adoption rules
- Date: 24 Jan 1993 01:42:21 GMT
- Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
- Lines: 17
- Distribution: na
- Message-ID: <1jss5tINNkd2@gap.caltech.edu>
- References: <1jkvmeINNkjs@gap.caltech.edu> <C181rH.2D6@cs.psu.edu> <1jnmblINNlqn@gap.caltech.edu> <C1BL79.9nz@cs.psu.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: sandman.caltech.edu
-
- beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
-
- >peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
- >>beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
-
- >Now, Michal, what do *you* propose?
-
- Don, I've thought about it alot this weekend. I've concluded that
- the *good* of protecting the father's right to stop an adoption is not
- worth the *bad* of subjecting the mother and child to the risk of
- injury from an abusive father. Thus I cannot condone a legal
- requirement for paternal notification.
- --
-
- -- Michal
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Impressive amounts of material can be accreted in this manner.
-