home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky soc.men:23152 alt.abortion.inequity:6674 alt.feminism:7547
- Newsgroups: soc.men,alt.abortion.inequity,alt.feminism
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!psuvax1!castor.cs.psu.edu!beaver
- From: beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver)
- Subject: Re: Privacy -- and responsibility
- Message-ID: <C1Boz1.C11@cs.psu.edu>
- Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: castor.cs.psu.edu
- References: <1jg739INNl6g@gap.caltech.edu> <C146FG.Eyw@cs.psu.edu> <1ji8gqINNg2i@gap.caltech.edu>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 20:01:49 GMT
- Lines: 28
-
- peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
- >beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
- >
- >>>If men didn't have to pay for children -- if they could have "responsibility
- >>>free" sex and then call it quits when conception occurred....
- >
- >>We seem to be getting to the heart of your objections, Michal.
- >
- >>Men have sex, flee the scene, come back for a few privileges,
- >>then skip out. They have no obligations. Women who use no
- >>birth control and then have abortions are bearing responsibilities;
- >>men who use birth control which fails are "responsibility-free."
- >
- >Yes, that is a big part of my argument as pertains to the case where
- >no child is born. If a child *is* born it gets more complicated
- >that that because one must consider the rights of the child to be
- >cared for and supported.
- >
- >I am glad that finally seem to be understanding one another.
-
- Wow.
-
- I am speechless in the face of such unabashed sexism. At least
- it's better than hypocritical sexism. All IMO.
-
- Don
- --
- beaver@cs.psu.edu Opinions from the PC-challenged
-