home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: soc.culture.british
- Path: sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!geac!utcsri!skule.ecf!ambidge
- From: ambidge@ecf.toronto.edu (Chris Ambidge)
- Subject: Re: Postperson Pat. Was Re: Britain and HK
- Message-ID: <C1J03u.8Gn@ecf.toronto.edu>
- Organization: University of Toronto, Engineering Computing Facility
- References: <C1H34M.4vJ@apollo.hp.com> <1993Jan26.215359.24513@netcom.com> <C1Iwto.CuM@math.uwaterloo.ca>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 18:45:28 GMT
- Lines: 35
-
- There's been a fair bit of debate about de-sexing Postman Pat's name:
-
-
- >>Now *here's* an interesting subject. My daughter and nephews all
- >>love Postman Pat. The name can't be changed, nothing else will
- >>scan. "Postal Carrier Pat and his black & white cat.." nah.
- >>'Postperson' is an abomination, of course.
- >
-
- >When I was about five years old, living in Aldershot, Hants., I
- >remember one day I happened to see that a woman was delivering our
- >post. I was somewhat surprised by this, and said that she must be a
- >"postlady".
- >
- >"No", explained my father, "She is a postman. She may be a female
- >postman, but she is a postman."
- >
- >Since that time, I have always thought that this was the simplest
- >solution.
- >
-
- In this country, the actual title (they even had a union by this
- name) is "Letter Carrier", and that sounds like the best idea
- to me. Changing "man" to "person" usually sounds pretty ugly,
- and is a sore-thumb self-conspicuous retrofit.
-
- It would, though, never do to change the name of Postman Pat.
- Heck, what would Jess think? And Mrs Goggins would probably faint
- away -- which would Not Do.
-
- Chris
- --
- Chris Ambidge / ambidge@ecf.toronto.edu / ambidge@ecf.utoronto.ca
- chemical engineering / university of toronto
- 200 college st / toronto ON / M5S 1A4 // 416 978 3106
-