home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3 / NN_1993_3.iso / spool / soc / couples / 4840 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1993-01-21  |  1.1 KB  |  25 lines
  1. Newsgroups: soc.couples
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!think.com!ames!decwrl!deccrl!news.crl.dec.com!dbased.nuo.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!funlwb.stl.dec.com!flotsm!lugsden
  3. From: lugsden@flotsm.ozy.dec.com (Keith Lugsden)
  4. Subject: Re: A Question of Etiquette
  5. Message-ID: <1993Jan21.000034.6527@funlwb.enet.dec.com>
  6. Sender: lugsden@flotsm (Keith Lugsden)
  7. Nntp-Posting-Host: flotsm.ozy.dec.com
  8. Reply-To: lugsden@flotsm.ozy.dec.com (Keith Lugsden)
  9. Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
  10. References: <1993Jan15.162816.19537@ads.com> <93015.141714SEK@psuvm.psu.edu> <93018.171434SEK@psuvm.psu.edu>
  11. Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 00:00:34 GMT
  12. Lines: 11
  13.  
  14. In article <93018.171434SEK@psuvm.psu.edu>, SEK@psuvm.psu.edu (Sonja Kueppers) |> 
  15. |> For example, I have made the informed decision not to use
  16. |> "u" in "honor" and "favor" on my wedding invitations, because
  17. |> I think it's silly.  I realize that some guests will consider it
  18. |> improper and flying in the face of tradition.
  19. |> 
  20.  
  21. I'm intrigued. I thought Americans dropped the 'u' from all those words. Has 
  22. it reappeared in wedding invitations?
  23.  
  24. Keith
  25.