home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech
- Path: sparky!uunet!math.fu-berlin.de!ira.uka.de!scsing.switch.ch!univ-lyon1.fr!ghost.dsi.unimi.it!rpi!gatech!concert!sas!mozart.unx.sas.com!sasghm
- From: sasghm@theseus.unx.sas.com (Gary Merrill)
- Subject: Re: QM
- Originator: sasghm@theseus.unx.sas.com
- Sender: news@unx.sas.com (Noter of Newsworthy Events)
- Message-ID: <C1KHMJ.2oK@unx.sas.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 14:01:31 GMT
- References: <C17sFv.L03@umassd.edu>,<1993Jan21.195455.26027@ulrik.uio.no> <C1F4uJ.EtG@umassd.edu> <spurrett.126.728212383@superbowl.und.ac.za>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: theseus.unx.sas.com
- Organization: SAS Institute Inc.
- Lines: 20
-
-
- In article <spurrett.126.728212383@superbowl.und.ac.za>, spurrett@superbowl.und.ac.za (David Spurrett) writes:
-
- |> Your definitions were inaccurate and your judgement uninformed, malicious
- |> and childishly expressed. Since your style centrally involves radical
- |> undersubstantiation of your views it appears that it is you who are avoiding
- |> the ideas.
-
- It is possible that Grossman has confused quantum mechanics with
- quantum *semantics*. This is a lesser known field, and the only
- paper I have ever seen devoted to it was in the _Journal of Irreproducible
- Results_ (an issue in the mid-80's I believe -- I'm not sure I still
- have a copy of the paper). I do not recall the details, but I think
- Grossman's remarks may be more accurate when applied to quantum semantics,
- although I don't believe the quanta of meaning participated in *random*
- combinations either.
- --
- Gary H. Merrill [Principal Systems Developer, C Compiler Development]
- SAS Institute Inc. / SAS Campus Dr. / Cary, NC 27513 / (919) 677-8000
- sasghm@theseus.unx.sas.com ... !mcnc!sas!sasghm
-