home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!husc-news.harvard.edu!husc10.harvard.edu!dnolan
- From: dnolan@husc10.harvard.edu (David Nolan)
- Newsgroups: sci.geo.meteorology
- Subject: Re: wet California correlated with solar geophysical activity
- Message-ID: <1993Jan26.225236.19841@husc3.harvard.edu>
- Date: 27 Jan 93 03:52:36 GMT
- Article-I.D.: husc3.1993Jan26.225236.19841
- References: <1993Jan22.163518.13003@unocal.com> <1993Jan22.172028.150@ncar.ucar.edu> <1993Jan25.203535.5296@ists.ists.ca>
- Organization: Harvard University Science Center
- Lines: 19
- Nntp-Posting-Host: husc10.harvard.edu
-
- In article <1993Jan25.203535.5296@ists.ists.ca> bsugars@nereid.sal.ists.ca (Benjamin Sugars) writes:
- >In article <1993Jan22.172028.150@ncar.ucar.edu> ilana@kiowa.scd.ucar.edu (Ilana Stern) writes:
- >>On the other hand, my father gives a talk in which he shows these great
- >>graphs correlating solar activity with a) storks nesting in chimneys
- >>in Sweden, and b) the number of papers published by Sidney Chapman.
- >>Correlation != causation.
- >
- >Correct me if I'm wrong, but couldn't any two events that are periodic
- >show some kind of unusually high correlation, no matter how unrelated
- >they may be?
- >
- >Later,
- >-Ben
- >
-
- Only if they have the same oscillation period. But I think Ilana
- was joking anyway...
-
- Dave
-