home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!news.univie.ac.at!scsing.switch.ch!univ-lyon1.fr!ghost.dsi.unimi.it!rpi!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!warwick!uknet!edcastle!festival!cir
- From: cir@festival.ed.ac.uk (C Revie)
- Newsgroups: sci.energy
- Subject: Re: Roads and Taxes (was Re: NEWS: True Costs of )
- Message-ID: <30876@castle.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 27 Jan 93 14:51:02 GMT
- References: <51868@seismo.CSS.GOV> <=b#s4vc@dixie.com> <30539@castle.ed.ac.uk> <C1Fooy.8x5@da_vinci.it.uswc.uswest.com>
- Sender: nntpusr@castle.ed.ac.uk
- Lines: 16
-
- tdean@makedustuswest.com (Tony Dean) writes:
-
-
- >Not necessarily. Gov't is not the only perveyor of infrastructure. When
- >we get good work at a reasonable return on investment thats good. When
- >we get slipshod, corrupt, poorly managed, and unnecessary projects
- >it is bad. There is far too much "BAD" in many of our buracracies. Some
- >ppl are simply tired of it.
-
-
- Fine! I'm also tired of bad government. I'm just tired of people who
- complain about bad government voting for parties who practice bad
- government.
-
-
- Chris
-