home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!nic.umass.edu!dime!chelm.cs.umass.edu!yodaiken
- From: yodaiken@chelm.cs.umass.edu (victor yodaiken)
- Newsgroups: sci.energy
- Subject: Re: Greenpeace press releases -- fact or fiction?
- Keywords: energy environment press
- Message-ID: <59048@dime.cs.umass.edu>
- Date: 23 Jan 93 01:51:39 GMT
- References: <58992@dime.cs.umass.edu> <1993Jan21.225328.27641@gn.ecn.purdue.edu> <1993Jan22.142713.27201@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Sender: news@dime.cs.umass.edu
- Organization: University of Massachusetts, Amherst
- Lines: 26
-
- In article <1993Jan22.142713.27201@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> trh2m@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Thomas Richard Hubbard) writes:
- >In article <1993Jan21.225328.27641@gn.ecn.purdue.edu> constant@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Tino) writes:
- >>
- >>Okay, Victor, here's your big chance:
- >>
- >>Tell us all how the chances of a meltdown from a CANDU are 1 in 17, not
- >>1 in 17,000,....
- >>
- >>I want to see your model, your assumptions, and your *measured data* to
- >>back this up.
- >
- >While you're at it, please explain what you mean by the "chances of a meltown
- >from a CANDU are 1 in 17." Is this supposed to mean over the course of a
- >year or for a certain number of operating hours? Is this supposed to apply
- >for any specific CANDU, or all CANDU's together? This statement says
- >nothing until you define the sample space.
- >
-
- I never made that claim. Try reading the post.
-
-
- --
-
-
- yodaiken@chelm.cs.umass.edu
-
-