home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.skiing
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!Freenet.carleton.ca!aa382
- From: aa382@Freenet.carleton.ca (Marc Sira)
- Subject: Re: Red Mountain, Canada
- Message-ID: <1993Jan21.204717.16277@freenet.carleton.ca>
- Sender: news@freenet.carleton.ca (News Administrator)
- Reply-To: aa382@Freenet.carleton.ca (Marc Sira)
- Organization: The National Capital Freenet
- References: <19876@mindlink.bc.ca>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 20:47:17 GMT
- Lines: 26
-
-
- In a previous article, John_McKercher@mindlink.bc.ca (John McKercher) says:
-
- >Well...one run is listed as a 5 black diamond run (called Wherever!
- >- You're Lost), two are four black diamond runs and one is a three
-
- I don't think the 5-diamond thing is meant to refer to a specific run;
- rather, it's anywhere on the mountain where you don't see a trail
- marker B-).
-
- I don't know that I like the idea of 3 and 4 diamond designations...
- goes back to the ancient argument over double-blacks, I suppose.
-
- Presumably, anything that _really_ deserves 4 diamonds shouldn't be on the
- trail map...
-
- --
- Marc Sira |
- toh@micor.ocunix.on.ca | "Your god drinks...p-p-peach nectar!"
- aa382@freenet.carleton.ca '
-
-