home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!pica.army.mil
- From: erudnick@pica.army.mil (FSAC-SID)
- Newsgroups: rec.guns
- Subject: Re: Glock vs. Sig!?
- Message-ID: <9301261249.aa27731@claudius.pica.army.mil>
- Date: 27 Jan 93 03:39:08 GMT
- Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu
- Lines: 22
- Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu
-
-
- Hurray, round umpteen :)
-
-
- James P. Callison writes:
- #SIG is better, because God hisself told me in a dream. :-)
-
- Which God?
-
- :)
-
- I recently though about buying a SIG-Sauer, but decided that one cheaply
- made stamped steel gun is enough :)
-
- The P-210, now there's a REAL SIG. Oh to be rich :)
-
-
- Ed Rudnicki erudnick@pica.army.mil All disclaimers apply
- Protect the Second Amendment - boycott Ruger products
- Geordi: "...it's like the laws of physics went right out the
- window." Q: "And why shouldn't they? They're so inconvenient."
-
-