home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!cu-dialup-0210.cit.cornell.edu!mss1
- From: Michael S. Shappe <mss1@cornell.edu>
- Newsgroups: news.groups
- Subject: Re: rec.arts.startrek.reviews moderated and proposed rec.arts.startrek split
- Date: 23 Jan 1993 19:04:49 GMT
- Organization: Cornell University
- Lines: 25
- Sender: mss1@cornell.edu (Verified)
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <1js4shINNglg@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu>
- References: <1993Jan23.033716.15552@cbnewsl.cb.att.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: cu-dialup-0210.cit.cornell.edu
- X-UserAgent: Nuntius v1.1.1d16
- X-XXMessage-ID: <A78702981904EC34@cu-dialup-0210.cit.cornell.edu>
- X-XXDate: Sat, 23 Jan 93 19:11:36 GMT
-
- In article <1993Jan23.033716.15552@cbnewsl.cb.att.com> Paul S R Chisholm,
- psrc@pegasus.att.com writes:
- >(1) To create a moderated medium for reviews of *any* STAR TREK-
- >related work: ... This has been proposed
- >both as a newsgroup and as a mailing list.
-
- ...and the mailing list now exists as Trek-Review-L@cornell.edu. See the
- announcement in rec.arts.startrek.(current|misc|(info)?).
-
- >>(2) To split ras.current into ras.current.tng and ras.current.ds9 (and
- >possibly ras.current.misc?)
-
- Just Say No!
-
- >I would not subscribe to a moderated STAR TREK reviews mailing list. I
- >live and die by e-mail (e-mail systems are what I do for a living); I
- >need to separate my "recreational computing" from my job. If the list
- >and the group were linked, we'd have the best of both worlds.
-
- I'm sorry to hear that you will not be subscribing to the list, although
- I understand your reasons...however, you'll be happy to know that, should
- a .reviews come into existance, the list and the group will almost
- undoubtedly be linked in some fashion.
-
- Mikey the Trek-Review-L Moderator Guy
-