home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU!werple.apana.org.au!news
- From: bob@werple.apana.org.au (Bob Blanchett)
- Newsgroups: news.groups
- Subject: Re: RFD: rec.games.miniatures
- Date: 23 Jan 1993 08:53:09 +1100
- Organization: Werple, Public Access *NIX, Oz
- Lines: 21
- Message-ID: <1jpqc5INNgae@werple.apana.org.au>
- References: <1jmsclINNh24@rodan.UU.NET> <1jmsgkINN8r8@charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu> <93021.154622IK20001@MAINE.MAINE.EDU>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: werple.apana.org.au
-
- In article <93021.154622IK20001@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> IK20001@MAINE.MAINE.EDU (Solipsist@Large) writes:
- >I have no problem with the proposed rec.games.miniatures. However,
- >I'd like a list of those `several groups, mailing lists and digests'
- >where minatures discussion is taking place. The implication is that
- >discussion is very common, while I've never noticed more than a few
- >token messages in rec.games.frp.misc or rec.games.board. I may be
- >wrong, of course.
- >
- >I'm not debating the usefulness of the group -- I'm just looking for
- >the alluded-to evidence.
- >--
-
- Eric,
-
- read the FAQ for Rec.games.board. it lists a number of lists. Also look at
- the "publicly accessible mailing lists" documents found in the news.* groups
- it lists a number of gaming groups as well
-
- most of the miniatures discussion takes place on 3 or 4 lists.
-
- Bob.
-