home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.invest
- Path: sparky!uunet!mailgate.mobil.com!etpeters
- From: etpeters@dal.mobil.com (E. T. Peterson(Eric))
- Subject: Re: Covered Calls: Less Risk - High Returns.
- Message-ID: <1993Jan21.213932.28063@mobil.com>
- Sender: news@mobil.com
- Organization: Mobil Exploration & Producing Technical Center(MEPTEC), Dallas.
- References: <1993Jan18.230334.26026@novell.com> <1993Jan20.192644.13834@mobil.com> <1993Jan21.180251.28864@odin.corp.sgi.com>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 21:39:32 GMT
- Lines: 31
-
- In article <1993Jan21.180251.28864@odin.corp.sgi.com>, tjordan@sgi.com (Ted Jordan) writes:
-
- |> >|> A friend told me about the covered calls. This looks like very low
- |> >|> risk but good return to me.
-
- |> Is there the same kind of thing for PUTS? (Is there such a thing; rather
- |> is it called a "covered put", and do you have an example of this scenario?
-
- Yes.
-
- When you sell a stock short, you could also sell a put on that stock.
- This is analogous to covered call writing on a long position.
-
- For example, you short a stock at $40 and sell a 35 put at $2.
-
- At the expiration date of the put, if the stock is below $35, you will
- have to buy it for $35, thus covering your short position.
-
- If the stock is above $35, the put expires worthless.
-
- In either case you keep the $2 put premium.
-
- The drawback is if the stock goes way down, say to $20, you still have to
- buy it at $35.
-
- *********************************************************************
- Eric Peterson The sooner you fall behind,
- Research Geophysicist the more time you'll have to catch up!
- (214) 951-3251
- etpeters@dal.mobil.com
- *********************************************************************
-