home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!portal!lll-winken!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!hri.com!noc.near.net!inmet!bluefin!mazur
- From: mazur@bluefin.camb.inmet.com (Beth Mazur)
- Newsgroups: misc.fitness
- Subject: Re: Too high? [Re: More on max heart rate]
- Message-ID: <1993Jan26.144834.8854@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
- Date: 26 Jan 93 14:48:34 GMT
- References: <1993Jan25.001438.46713@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> <1993Jan25.163202.17422@cbnews.cb.att.com> <1k1c8bINNm0l@OPAL.SYSTEMSX.CS.YALE.EDU>
- Sender: news@inmet.camb.inmet.com
- Organization: Intermetrics, Inc.
- Lines: 13
- Nntp-Posting-Host: bluefin
-
- In article <1k1c8bINNm0l@OPAL.SYSTEMSX.CS.YALE.EDU> A. Satish Pai <Pai-Satish@CS.Yale.Edu> writes:
- >Am I doing something wrong? As another poster mentioned here, I don't feel I'm
- >working out if I go any easier. By the way, my resting pulse rate is about 60.
- >Is the formula supposed to be applicable to all/most people?
-
- Covert Bailey claims that 15% of people have hearts that beat slower than
- average and another 15% that beat faster. He tacks on another 10% who are
- on some type of medication and comes up with the figure that 40% may not
- find the standard heart rate formula valid.
-
- Beth Mazur "...life is more than a vision. The sweetest
- mazur@inmet.inmet.com part is acting after making a decision."
- ...!uunet!inmet!mazur -- The Indigo Girls
-