home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.consumers.house
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!udel!gvls1!rmtc.paramax.com!garyp
- From: garyp@rmtc.paramax.com (Gary Palangian [RMTC/ISP])
- Subject: Re: Dispute with Home Owners Assn - Advice Sought
- Message-ID: <1993Jan21.234718.3618@VFL.Paramax.COM>
- Sender: news@VFL.Paramax.COM (IEE news user)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: rmtcf4.rmtc.paramax.com
- Organization: Paramax Systems
- References: <1993Jan21.200204.11629@netcom.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 23:47:18 GMT
- Lines: 40
-
- In article <1993Jan21.200204.11629@netcom.com>, bsardis@netcom.com (Barry Sardis) writes:
- |> I own a condo. I engaged a mangement company to locate a tenant.
- |> This is the same company that manages the complex for the HOA. The
- |> tenants have a dog and they keep it chained on the patio.
- |>
- |> Some residents complained about the dog. The HOA CC&Rs do not allow
- |> pets in the complex. There are lots of cats in the complex, roaming
- |> free.
- |>
- |> I have had conversations with the management company on the situation.
- |> There have been some discussions and compromises. The management
- |> company sends threatening letters and fines my account. I wrote a
- |> letter asking for a dialog, but the next letter was more of the same
- |> without even an acknowledgement of my letter.
- |>
- |> I intend to speak directly to the board. There are numerous other
- |> violations of the CC&Rs evident in the complex. I am not normally
- |> one who makes waves.
- |>
- |> What I want to know is do I have any legal recourse to get them to
- |> stop the harrassment? Can I take them to small claims court?
- |>
- |> --
- |> Barry Sardis | Home: (408) 448-1589
- |> 1241 Laurie Avenue | Office: (408) 448-7404
- |> San Jose, CA 95125 | Fax: (408) 448-7404
- |> Email: bsardis@netcom.COM or 70105.1210@compuserve.COM
-
- This is sickening...
-
- You hire them to find a tenant. They find a tenant who is
- breaking the rules, and YOUR responsible? I don't know about
- the law, but I can't image a jury who would go against you.
- I would seriously consider a civil proceeding.
-
-
- Party On...
-
-
- Gary P.
-