home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.consumers.house
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!paperboy.osf.org!paperboy!macrakis
- From: macrakis@osf.org (Stavros Macrakis)
- Subject: Re: when does it make sense to reduce the
- In-Reply-To: breland@cobweb.mcc.com's message of Thu, 21 Jan 1993 14:42:08 GMT
- Message-ID: <MACRAKIS.93Jan21124235@lakatos.osf.org>
- Sender: news@osf.org (USENET News System)
- Organization: OSF Research Institute
- References: <1993Jan20.211239.28817@erg.sri.com> <1993Jan21.144208.24822@mcc.com>
- Date: 21 Jan 93 12:42:35
- Lines: 43
-
- In article <1993Jan21.144208.24822@mcc.com> breland@cobweb.mcc.com (Mark A. Breland) writes:
-
- Whichever direction a person decides to go (mortgage buydown vs. credit card
- payoff), it basically boils down to who they want to give their money to.
- Buying down a mortgage is great, but they still pay all the credit card
- interest PLUS their tax deductible mortgage interest is reduced. Going
- the other way, they reduce their giveaways in the form of non-tax deductible
- interest to the credit card issuers and retain a higher level of tax
- deductible mortgage interest, but they remain in debt for a longer period
- of time.
-
- No. This is still not right. For a given monthly payment, you will
- get out of debt faster if you first pay off high interest rate loans
- (e.g. credit cards) and only then start paying off lower interest rate
- loans (e.g. mortgage).
-
- Moreover, if you pay off the credit card first, you increase the
- available line of credit for emergencies. (Of course, they could open
- a home equity credit line, too.)
-
- Either way, you pay...it's just a matter of how much or less either
- approach steals from you. Run your own numbers and make your own
- choice.
-
- No. There is NOT a tradeoff here. It is ALWAYS better to pay off the
- higher-interest loan first.
-
- Let me try another way of presenting it.
-
- For every borrower, there is a corresponding lender. Let's look at it
- from the lender's point of view. He has two loans out to you, one of
- $100,000 at 8% interest, the other of $5,000 at 18% interest. If the
- borrower pays $5,000 to him, where would he rather it go? If it goes
- to the mortgage, he is now left with a $95,000 investment at 8%, and a
- $5,000 investment at 18% interest. That is, his investment income is
- $8,500 annually. If it goes to the credit card, he is left with a
- $100,000 investment at 8% and a $0 investment at 18%, giving annual
- investment income of $8,000. Clearly he'd rather you pay down the
- mortgage. Equally clearly, the extra $500 are coming from your
- pocket, so you should prefer to pay down the credit card. And this
- ignores the mortgage interest subsidy you receive.
-
- -s
-