home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!news.netmbx.de!mailgzrz.TU-Berlin.DE!math.fu-berlin.de!ira.uka.de!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!cs.utk.edu!cs.utk.edu!eijkhout
- From: eijkhout@cupid.cs.utk.edu (Victor Eijkhout)
- Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
- Subject: Re: Which is better, OzTeX or Textures?
- Date: 26 Jan 93 12:12:48
- Organization: /pearl/homes/eijkhout/.organization
- Lines: 13
- Message-ID: <EIJKHOUT.93Jan26121248@cupid.cs.utk.edu>
- References: <1993Jan21.181657.7128@hubcap.clemson.edu> <30746@castle.ed.ac.uk>
- <1993Jan26.015518.12345@maths.tcd.ie>
- <ROLFL.93Jan26102735@ulrik.uio.no>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: cupid.cs.utk.edu
- In-reply-to: rolfl@ulrik.uio.no's message of Tue, 26 Jan 1993 11:27:35 GMT
-
- In article <ROLFL.93Jan26102735@ulrik.uio.no> rolfl@ulrik.uio.no (Rolf Lindgren) writes:
-
- It's a drawback that there's no simple way to convert bitmap (pk) fonts
- to Textures fonts.
-
- Is there really a Textures font format, or is that just general Macintosh?
- In that case it is somewhat amazing that no one has written a convertor.
-
- --
- Victor Eijkhout ................................ `There are also a few bugs,
- Department of Computer Science .......... though not as many as I've come to
- University of Tennessee ............... expect in new [MS]Windows products.'
- Knoxville TN 37919 ................................ (from a software review)
-