home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!newsserver.jvnc.net!princeton!moo!awolfe
- From: awolfe@moo.Princeton.EDU (Andrew Wolfe)
- Subject: Re: Performance of Sparc Classic?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan25.234012.9459@Princeton.EDU>
- Originator: news@nimaster
- Keywords: classic sparc performance spec mips mflops benchmarks
- Sender: news@Princeton.EDU (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: moo.princeton.edu
- Organization: Princeton University
- References: <phoenix.727660358@well.sf.ca.us> <51917@seismo.CSS.GOV>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 23:40:12 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <51917@seismo.CSS.GOV>, dsc@seismo.CSS.GOV (taste is the enemy of art) writes:
- |>
- |> 2 21.8 22.8 28.5 4.2 64 16
- |> Classic 26.4 21.0 59.1 4.6 6 64
- |> LX 26.4 21.0 59.1 4.6 6 64
- |> 10/20 39.8 46.6 77.5 9.5 16/20 65536
- |>
- |> * in KBs - cache is unified unless marked as data/instruction.
- |> + also has a 1 MB external cache.
-
-
-
- I believe that the Classic/LX have 4k+2K caches, not 6K unified.
-
- (Based on Hot-Chips Tsunami presentation)
-
-
- --
- --------------------------------------
- Andrew Wolfe
- Assistant Professor
- Department of Electrical Engineering
- Princeton University
-