home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!destroyer!gatech!darwin.sura.net!seismo!dsc
- From: dsc@seismo.CSS.GOV (taste is the enemy of art)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.hardware
- Subject: Re: Performance of Sparc Classic?
- Keywords: classic sparc performance spec mips mflops benchmarks
- Message-ID: <51917@seismo.CSS.GOV>
- Date: 25 Jan 93 16:19:58 GMT
- References: <phoenix.727660358@well.sf.ca.us>
- Sender: usenet@seismo.CSS.GOV
- Organization: Center for Seismic Studies, Arlington, VA
- Lines: 22
- Nntp-Posting-Host: beno.css.gov
- Originator: dsc@beno.CSS.GOV
-
-
- the following table might help ... compiled from official sun literature, etc.
- i included the published numbers for mips (old dhrystone) & mflops (linpack)
- although they should be ignored. :-) the spec92 numbers are better indicators
- of relative performance. your milage will vary ...
-
- Model SPECint92 SPECfp92 MIPS MFLOPS Cache* Contexts
- ----- --------- -------- ---- ------ ------ --------
- ELC 18.2 17.9 23.7 3.4 64 8
- IPC 13.8 11.1 17.8 1.8 64 8
- IPX 21.8 21.5 28.5 4.2 64 8
- 2 21.8 22.8 28.5 4.2 64 16
- Classic 26.4 21.0 59.1 4.6 6 64
- LX 26.4 21.0 59.1 4.6 6 64
- 10/20 39.8 46.6 77.5 9.5 16/20 65536
- 10/30 44.2 52.9 86.1 10.6 16/20 65536
- 10/41 52.6 64.7 96.2 17.2 16/20+ 65536
- 10/52 58.1 71.4 107.3 19.0 16/20+ 65536
- 10/54 58.1 71.4 107.3 19.0 16/20+ 65536
-
- * in KBs - cache is unified unless marked as data/instruction.
- + also has a 1 MB external cache.
-