home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.programmer
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!karl@ensuing.com
- From: karl@ensuing.com (Karl Kraft)
- Subject: Re: IB broken with custom Box classes?
- Message-ID: <9301212325.AA00341@ensuing.com>
- Sender: daemon@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
- Reply-To: karl@ensuing.com (Karl Kraft)
- Organization: Ensuing Technologies Inc.
- References: <1993Jan21.164823.1865@afs.com>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 23:25:59 GMT
- Lines: 29
-
- In article <1993Jan21.164823.1865@afs.com> greg@afs.com (Gregory H.
- Anderson) writes:
- >Has anyone else noticed braindead behavior for custom Box classes in IB
- >3.0? We have an AfsBox class with some additional ivars to secure the
- >contents. Of course, the Group operation doesn't work, so you have to
- >alt-drag objects into it individually. So far so good. But once they're
- >inside, IB refuses to recognize them as attachable (i.e., it won't draw
- >rings around them while you're alt-dragging). Has anyone else noticed
- >this, and has it been reported to NeXT?
-
- No I have a palette with a subclass of Box, and this behaviour doesn't
- happen at all. My version in Release 3.0 v359.0, which is what came with
- the release of 3.0.
-
- But then again:
-
- >Of course, the Group operation doesn't work, so you have to
- >alt-drag objects into it individually.
-
- It's a well known (and well documented) bug that you can't alt drag objects
- in IB anymore. So obviouslly we have differnent versions. Fess up, what
- version number do you have?
-
-
- --
- __________
- Karl Kraft
- karl@ensuing.com (NeXT mail)
-
-