home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!pageworks.com!world!eff!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!darwin.sura.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!julienas!babbage!isis!gram!oueichek
- From: oueichek@gram (Ibaa Oueichek)
- Subject: Re: New Macs Supporting 16"ers...hmmm
- Message-ID: <C1J9xH.ICs@imag.fr>
- Sender: news@imag.fr (Administration des news)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: gram
- Organization: IMAG Institute, University of Grenoble, France
- X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
- References: <1993Jan26.232643.1@vmsb.is.csupomona.edu>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 22:17:41 GMT
- Lines: 26
-
- cvadsgvo@vmsb.is.csupomona.edu wrote:
- : In article <1k4t30INNkgj@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>, an780@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Travis Grundke) writes:
- : >
- : > Its interesting how most of Apple's new Macs have come out (and supposibly
- : > will come out) with support for 16" monitors. Just a few months ago word
- : > floated around here and in MacWEEK that Apple is trying to push 16"
- : > monitors as the 'future' standard. Is it me or is this rapidly occuring?
- : > --
- :
- : i think Apple is pushing but it will not really succeed until the price of 16
- : inches drops to around 700 dollars.
-
- $700 seems to be too low for a 17" monitor. I don't think such a price will be
- met soon, not even in a year. The least expensive usable 17" i saw was the SONY
- 1604S at ~$1000. I don't think there'll be a price drop of %30 in a year,
- despite the increasing demande and the potentially big market.
- :
- :
-
- --
- Sham(u) ya tha (s)seif(u) lam yaghib(i) | Ibaa Oueichek. oueichek@imag.imag.fr
- Ya jamal(al) majd(i) fi(l) kutub(i) | IMAG, INPG.
- Kablak(i) (t)tareekh(u) fi thulmaten | Grenoble.
- Baadak(i) staula ala (sh)shuhub(i) |
-
-
-