home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!bcm!lib!biomath.mda.uth.tmc.edu
- From: drg@biomath.mda.uth.tmc.edu (David GUtierrez)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
- Subject: Re: QuickMail<->SMTP gateways
- Message-ID: <8504@lib.tmc.edu>
- Date: 22 Jan 1993 06:15:17 GMT
- References: <1993Jan20.112134.25482@greco-prog.fr>
- Sender: usenet@lib.tmc.edu
- Organization: Univ. Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
- Lines: 17
- Nntp-Posting-Host: 129.106.3.192
-
- In article <1993Jan20.112134.25482@greco-prog.fr> harper@geocub.greco-prog.fr
- writes:
- >I've tried out QM 2.51 along with 2 SMTP gateways: Mail*Link SMTP for QM and
- >SMTP\QM.
- >
- >I would like to hear about any other alternatives to these products.
- >I will summarize all responses I receive to the net.
-
- I've been pointing mail administrators here to Dispatcher/QM. It's published by
- Intercon. It's a flat-rate-per-server gateway (around $800?) and performs well.
- Contact Jim Geddes at Intercon. I think his address is jim@intercon.com.
-
- David Gutierrez
- drg@biomath.mda.uth.tmc.edu
-
- "Only fools are positive." - Moe Howard
-
-