home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!decwrl!access.usask.ca!kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca!ee.ualberta.ca!fluet
- From: fluet@ee.ualberta.ca (Kevin Blaine Fluet)
- Subject: Re: ATI Ultra Pro: Good or SUCKS????
- Message-ID: <fluet.728171948@ee.ualberta.ca>
- Sender: news@kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca
- Nntp-Posting-Host: eigen.ee.ualberta.ca
- Organization: University Of Alberta, Edmonton Canada
- References: <1993Jan18.132858.36685@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> <1993Jan18.183906.29951@bnr.ca> <1993Jan19.213036.3561@VFL.Paramax.COM> <_ah3djk@rpi.edu> <1993Jan20.174055.23059@VFL.Paramax.COM>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 21:59:08 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- pastor@prc.unisys.com (Jon Pastor) writes:
-
- >In article <_ah3djk@rpi.edu>, gilem@rebecca.its.rpi.edu (Michael R. Gile) writes:
- >|> Well, I have one too, and although it is fast, it still doesn't compare to
- >|> a Sun, NeXT, or RS/6000 for scrolling speed, but it is still really fast.
- >|> I certainly could always use more speed, though, and if you are running windows
- >|> all the time, I would suggest getting the fastest video you can!
-
- >Funny, I have a SPARCstation 2 on my desk, and my subjective impression is
- >that the ATI is *AT LEAST* as fast. Actually, I feel that it's faster, but I
- >didn't want to say that lest nobody believe me...
-
- My Gateway 66V (with the Ultra Pro) running X (under Linux -- a free unix
- clone) is _definitely_ faster than the NeXT's I have used.
-
- -------------------------
- Kevin Fluet
- fluet@ee.ualberta.ca
- -------------------------
-
-